1. Natural Law and Natural Rights Perhaps the most central concept in Locke’s political philosophy is his theory of natural law and natural rights. The natural law concept existed long before Locke as a way of expressing the idea that there were certain moral truths that applied to all people, regardless of the particular place where they lived or the agreements they had made. The most Substantially abandoning contention on the basis of the rights of Englishmen, the declaration put forth the more fundamental doctrines of natural rights and of government under social contract. The Declaration of Independence The Want, Will, and Hopes of the People Declaration text | Rough Draft | Congress's Draft | Compare | Dunlap Broadside | Image | Scan These three documents, known collectively as the Charters of Freedom, have secured the rights of the American people for more than two and a quarter centuries and are considered instrumental to the founding and philosophy of the United States. Declaration of Independence Learn More The Declaration of Independence expresses the ideals on which the United States was founded and the reasons for The Declaration of Independence: Unalienable vs. Inalienable The phrase “unalienable Rights” is one of the most famous lines in American history, found in the Declaration of Independence. But was this word choice deliberate? Let’s unpack the details. Jefferson’s Original Draft In Thomas Jefferson’s first draft, the term inalienable The goodness of the Declaration, and the intentions of the signers, is best found in the grievances as therein lies a justification for independence through the pursuit of the public good as achieved intentionally through the rule of law and proper governance. The Declaration of Independence made certain promises about which liberties were fundamental and inherent, but those liberties didn’t become legally enforceable until they were enumerated in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If the first and final role of natural law in the Declaration is to explain the independence of the United States from the perspective of the law of nations, its second and central function is to ground the theory of God-given rights and man-made government that comprises its most memorable passage, justifying not only independence but revolution: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of HappinessOffice for Emergency Management. Office of War Information war poster (1942). " Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness " is a well-known phrase from the United States Declaration of Independence. [1] The phrase gives three examples of the unalienable rights which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their Creator, and which The Declaration has been repeatedly cited by the U.S. Supreme Court as part of the fundamental law of the United States of America. "The United States Code Annotated includes the Declaration of Independence under the heading 'The Organic Laws of the United States of America' along with the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, and the The United States Declaration of Independence is a significant document in the country's history, marking a pivotal moment in the American Revolutionary War and the colonists' pursuit of independence from Great Britain. While it does not carry the force of law domestically, it holds considerable historical and legal value, providing clarity and context to the Constitution and other laws. The Declarations of independence are the defining legal documents of the Age of Revolutions in the Americas. The very first declaration of independence in world history—the U.S. Declaration of Independence—appeared in British North America in July 1776. Note: The following text is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflects the original. My goal in this Article is to explore this question, arguing that both the legality of the Constitution and the current presumed non-legality of the Declaration are matters of contingent empirical and sociological fact rather than being functions of anything more formal, more logical, or more legal. The Declaration of Independence is widely understood not to be law, unlike the Constitution, which is universally recognised as such. Despite this, the Declaration has been referenced in legal rhetoric and constitutional interpretation. For nearly two centuries the Supreme Court has invoked the Declaration of Independence. Much of that time, it has used the Declaration to define the meaning of racial equality. The Declaration of Independence was succeeded by the Articles of Confederation, which were succeeded by the Constitution. Thus, they have been replaced TWICE now by later, more inclusive, laws. The Declaration of Independence is a testament to the profound influence of natural law on the Founding Fathers. Through Jefferson's articulation, we see natural law principles operating as the moral foundation upon which American independence was justified and a new government erected. A quick search at Findlaw indicates that there are at least 100 United States Supreme Court cases that mention the words "Declaration of Independence" somewhere in the dicta of that opinion. The Declaration of Independence provides valuable insights into matters of human dignity, privacy, and self-government. Its statements about human rights, equality, and popular sovereignty establish a foundational rule of interpretation.
Articles and news, personal stories, interviews with experts.
Photos from events, contest for the best costume, videos from master classes.
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |